Academic paper on fornesiv anthropology and genocide

Words: 3000 Referencing Style: Harvard Topic: Does the contribution of Forensic Anthropology to an investigation lead to a more likely prosecution? Needs extremely good grasp of English language because it is a complex topic. Additional Info: 1.) You need to focus on the cross-border comparison of the genocide of Kurds, Christians, and Shi'ites in Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Kurdistan, to address the systematic slaughter of minority groups within these countries. The rationale for this focus is achieved through reviewing and utilising the work of Schmitt (2002). 2.) Review the extent to which the evidence offered by forensic anthropology in previous genocide trials has failed, using Klinkner (2008) as a basis. 3.) Review the extent to which improvements in the arena of forensic evidence since the outbreak of the Kosovan war have resulted in a greater international reliance upon the science for successful prosecution. Include reference to the work of Baraybar and Gasior (2006). 4.) Consider how, and to what extent, best practice in 'non-conflict zones' with regards to forensic anthropology can be transferred and applied to fields of conflict. Needs a wide range of sources such as journals, law, cases and textbooks. Also consider if possible commentaries from the national press and respected international journals such as The Economist with regards to issues of genocide. No need for introduction or conclusion and please do not outline the offence of genocide - go straight into analysis. This needs to be done by 10th March at 10am Greek time. If the order is submitted after this time it is useless and the order will be cancelled.